Friday : May 9, 2025
04 : 09 : 11 AM
Breaking News

The directors of Kantara 2 maintain the junior artist's death did not happen on the Rishab Shetty movie sets and send their sympathies to his family.

If Hindus are safe, then Muslims are also safe in Uttar Pradesh’: CM Yogi Adityanath

top-news



Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath’s statement—**"If Hindus are safe, then Muslims are also safe in Uttar Pradesh"**—has sparked widespread debate. The remark, made in the context of law and order in the state, reflects his government’s approach to governance and communal harmony. While some view it as a reassurance of equal security for all communities, others question its implications on secularism and minority rights in India’s most populous state.  

The Context of the Statement

Yogi Adityanath, known for his strong stance on law and order, made this statement while emphasizing his government’s zero-tolerance policy toward crime and communal violence. His argument is that a stable and secure environment for the majority community (Hindus) naturally ensures safety for minorities (Muslims) as well. This aligns with his administration’s tough measures against rioters, criminals, and anti-social elements, regardless of religion.  

Supporters’ Perspective


Supporters of the CM argue that Uttar Pradesh has seen a decline in communal riots and organized crime under his leadership. They believe that strict policing and impartial enforcement of the law have created a safer environment for all citizens. The statement is interpreted as an affirmation that the government does not discriminate in maintaining law and order—when the majority feels secure, minorities benefit too.  

Additionally, BJP leaders and Hindu nationalist groups often argue that previous governments practiced "appeasement politics," favoring minorities for electoral gains. In contrast, Yogi’s administration claims to treat all communities equally under the law, without special privileges for any group.  

Critics’ Concerns

However, critics argue that the statement indirectly suggests that the safety of Muslims is contingent upon the satisfaction of the Hindu majority, rather than being an inherent right. Opponents, including opposition parties and civil rights activists, allege that the BJP government has fostered a majoritarian atmosphere where Muslims face discrimination in matters of citizenship (CAA-NRC), mob violence, and hate speech.  

Incidents like the 2019 anti-CAA protests, the Hathras case, and allegations of bulldozer justice targeting Muslim properties have raised questions about whether minorities truly feel secure. Some Muslim leaders and activists argue that while overt violence may have reduced, systemic biases and fear persist.  


Secularism vs. Majoritarian Governance

India’s constitutional framework guarantees equality and protection to all citizens, irrespective of religion. Yogi’s statement, however, is seen by some as a departure from traditional secular rhetoric, instead reflecting a majoritarian governance model where minority safety is viewed through the lens of majority sentiment.  

Conclusion

Yogi Adityanath’s remark underscores a polarizing debate on security and communal relations in Uttar Pradesh. While his supporters credit him with improving law and order, critics remain skeptical about the equitable treatment of minorities. The true measure of safety for any community lies not just in the absence of violence but in the assurance of justice, equal opportunities, and inclusive governance. Whether UP achieves this balance will determine its future social harmony.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Category

Gallery

  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery
  • gallery

Tags

Social Media

Related Posts

top-news

According to the Shiv Sena, "modern Duryodhan" Raj Thackeray's ascent in the party was contested by Uddhav Thackeray

top-news

US VP India visit LIVE: Trade on the topic, Modi-Vance talks to start soon

top-news

Rahul Gandhi's EC comment angers Fadnavis, who says it "raises doubts about his character."